June 16, 2005
I'm getting old and a little absent-minded, so my friends got together and bought me a stylish little desk calendar. It's a cradle for two cubes, each with one number per face.
They figured I probably had enough left in me to figure what year it was and what month it was, but the date was going to elude me. So, this little gift was going to show the date. So, for example, if it were the 21st, I'd rotate one cube until a "2" was showing, and the other would show a "1". The next day I would know to rotate one cube so, together, the two cubes would read "22".
With the two cubes, I was able to express every date. For example, if it were the 2nd of the month, it would be expressed as "02". If it were the 18th you'd put up a 1 and an 8, and so on.
Here's my question. If you were designing the cubes, what numbers would you paint on each one so you could express all the dates from "01" to "31"?
My answer (and reasoning) below the fold. more...
Posted by: JohnL at
12:54 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 365 words, total size 2 kb.
June 13, 2005
Think intra-sticky. Do you have a scheme to become proactive? Our functionality is second to none, but our 60/60/24/7/365 development and non-complex operation is invariably considered an amazing achievement. Is it more important for something to be killer or to be subscriber-defined? Do you have a plan of action to become customized? The partnerships factor can be summed up in one word: impactful.
And another (nice inside joke for anyone who knows about web design):
We think that most B2B2C, compelling web portals use far too much XHTML, and not enough JavaScript.
The scary thing is that some people I work with talk just like that.
(Hat tip: GeekPress)
Posted by: JohnL at
10:14 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 125 words, total size 1 kb.
57 queries taking 0.1185 seconds, 158 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








