January 31, 2005
Appropriate Heinlein Quote
I found a perfect Heinlein quote for the coming month, to mark the momentous Iraqi elections yesterday:
Democracy is a poor system; the only thing that can be said for it is that it's eight times as good as any other method. Its worst fault is that its leaders reflect their constituents--a low level, but what can you expect?
From Heinlein's Stranger in a Strange Land.
Posted by: JohnL at
10:29 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 72 words, total size 1 kb.
January 30, 2005
They Voted!
I didn't really doubt that the Iraqis would vote in high numbers today, but it's nice to see the people of Iraq put the lie to the "vote and die" meme spread by the MSM and their
hack political cartoonists.
Tim Blair seems to have the best roundup of links to positive and negative coverage. I like Scrappleface's take on the event, too.
Some faces of freedom in the extended entry:
more...
Posted by: JohnL at
09:31 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 140 words, total size 1 kb.
1
TexasBestGrok: he reads Doonesbury, so you don't have to.
And I am grateful.
Posted by: owlish at January 30, 2005 11:15 PM (sBj9U)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 12, 2005
Health Insecurity
When I saw President Clinton hold up a mock "Health Security" card during his 1995 State of the Union address, I had what I thought was a brilliant flash for a science fiction story of some kind. I imagined a future in which the Health Security card became a regular part of commercial life in the same way that our Social Security numbers have become a part of our everyday credit approval process. Since it was described as a "smart card" with medical records embedded on it, I imagined a world in which people weren't allowed to buy ice cream, butter, alcohol, cigarettes, etc. because their card indicated they were a health risk to the cash register.
Well, it looks like someone else has had a similar idea, even though a different political party is now in power.
Posted by: JohnL at
10:53 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 142 words, total size 1 kb.
January 06, 2005
Was Tolkien A Conservative?
Rob the Llamabutcher tries to figure out whether Tolkien is the property of liberals or conservatives. Certainly a lot of hippies and counterculture types usually thought of as "liberals" loved Tolkien's fantasies. Conservatives love the struggle (and triumph) of good over evil.
I posted a lengthy comment there, and reproduce it below the fold:
more...
Posted by: JohnL at
10:48 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 183 words, total size 1 kb.
1
And because they assumed "pipeweed" was marijuana. Stoner hobbits, dude!
Posted by: owlish at January 07, 2005 10:05 AM (KP3t9)
2
A week? Oh, how sharper than a serpent's tooth!
Posted by: Timothy Sandefur at January 07, 2005 11:11 AM (xr2bk)
3
Timothy, thank you for your series on conservatism versus libertarianism. (There, I'm not a thankless child!)
In any case I think the post that started the kefuffle was on January 1 (Dillard v. Bork).
Perhaps I should clarify that this is a recurrent theme,
most recently revisited over the past week?
Posted by: JohnL at January 07, 2005 01:14 PM (YVul2)
4
I've been reading LOTR for, oh I'd say almost 40 years. Read 'em first time in 7th grade, in the 60's,and reread in high school and I had a pretty liberal take on them then. Of course we loved the pipeweed, dude. Read them to my first kid and started appreciating the celebration of traditional values - conservatism - then read things about Tolkien. Learned about him and Dorthy Sayers and C.S.Lewis, and their link to G.K Chesterton, and now I'm on my seventh reading to my fourth (and last) child and I now see them as a Christian allegory, which was intended by Tolkien, a devout catholic, raised by a priest after being orphaned. "The Lord of the Rings is of course a fundamentally religious and Catholic work," he wrote to his friend, Father Robert Murray, "unconsciously so at first, but consciously in the revision."
Posted by: Anselm at January 07, 2005 10:46 PM (qN7XT)
5
Isn't it a different experience to read the LOTR books aloud? I read them to my first kid during 2002-2003. Tolkien was really a master of the English language in a way not so apparent until you have read it aloud. Thanks for the input (and for your link).
Posted by: JohnL at January 07, 2005 10:50 PM (gplif)
6
Good point about reading aloud. Not one of my kids ever asked me to skip even the longset and seemingly boring descriptive paragraphs.
Posted by: anselm at January 08, 2005 10:31 AM (qN7XT)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
21kb generated in CPU 0.0209, elapsed 0.0771 seconds.
57 queries taking 0.0627 seconds, 163 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.