November 26, 2006
Plano as The New Peoria
Virginia Postrel has authored an enlightening article in the December issue of
Texas Monthly addressing the perception of Plano as the bellwether for "red-state" America.
Read the whole thing (registration required - visit Virginia's site to get the special password).
Posted by: JohnL at
10:22 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 50 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Postrel's last sentence, in which she refers to "child centered Plano" gave me pause, since I hesitate to call myself a child-centered person (I honestly try to have a life). But then I read this story on marriage and caste in America:
http://www.city-journal.org/html/16_1_marriage_gap.html
It is a sobering report on what happens when there are not enough child-centered parents who are on a Mission (the author gives it a capital M) to shape children into productive citizens.
Posted by: Beth A. at December 16, 2006 06:52 AM (7z/Ay)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 19, 2006
Not Dead Yet
I wish I could say the absence of posting around here was a result of drafting the next great American novel, but instead I have to confess a lack of desire to write much of anything. Intense legal work has a way of wringing out my desire to read
or write much.
I've got the coming week off, and plan to do a great deal of physically intense yard and house work. Maybe that will inspire some more recreational reading and writing energy.
But then again, maybe not. Check back and see.
Posted by: JohnL at
09:55 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 98 words, total size 1 kb.
November 07, 2006
Vote Today
Here's how I voted:
US Senator: Kay Bailey Hutchison (R), the Devil I know. The Democrat is a typical social democrat who supports socialized medicine. The Libertarian wants to repeal the income tax (good, if futile) and compel citizens to buy health insurance instead. Wrong answer.
US Representative: Sam Johnson (R), one of the few candidates that I feel really good voting for.
Governor: Kinky Friedman (I), purely as a protest vote for the least-powerful position in state government. I wouldn't have felt bad voting for incumbent Republican Rick Perry, as he ranked second-best in the libertarian Cato Institute's "Fiscal Policy Report Card on America's Governors: 2006" list of American governors.
Lieutenant Governor: Judy Baker (L). This is the most powerful office in Texas state government, and should therefore go to the clear limited-government candidate. Dewhurst hasn't been bad, as Republicans go, and will likely get the job, but Baker says the right things about limiting the scope and power of government.
Attorney General: Greg Abbott (R). He was a good judge, and has done nothing I find objectionable in his first term as AG. The Democrat wants to step up antitrust enforcement (loses my vote), and the Libertarian candidate for this position is, in my opinion, a loon.
Comptroller: Mike Burris (L). He's been a state employee for 26 years, and therefore understands the nature of the beast. A certified internal auditor, I think he is best-qualified to root out waste and report on the fiscal condition of the state government.
Land Commissioner: Michael French (L). I wish I could vote to eliminate the office altogether. Barring that, a Libertarian vote is probably the next-best-thing.
Agriculture Commissioner: Clay Woolam (L). Seems a bit flaky, but not too much so. Better than either major party candidate, who both seem a bit too activist for my taste.
Railroad Commissioner: Tabitha Serrano (L). This misnamed office is the most powerful regulatory agency in Texas (it regulates the oil and gas industry) and should go to the outsider committed to smaller government. Aside from having the hottest name in the race, here's what she has to say about her office: "Heck! I'm not actually sure what a railroad commissioner actually does, so the first thing I intend to do is figure that out and then get the darn thing renamed to something that makes sense, or maybe do away with it entirely."
For the State Supreme Court and Court of Criminal Appeals, I voted against every Republican (for the Libertarian if there was one, otherwise for the Democrat challenger).
Posted by: JohnL at
08:59 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 430 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Mike Burris? That guy still owes me money!
Posted by: Robert the Llama Butcher at November 09, 2006 08:12 AM (fKpiB)
2
Sam Johnson? Other than cutting taxes, the man's record on everything from spending and subsidies to civil liberties and victimless crimes makes him the antithesis of what I would expect a libertarian to support.
John, I'm going to ask a question in a rude format, not because I want to score points or be hurtful, but because it is the clearest way I can raise my question: Is it possible that your libertarianism is not so much based on libertarian ideals, but instead on finding a "principled" justification for your dislike of taxes?
Posted by: Jeffrey Goldberg at November 16, 2006 08:46 PM (xzg5w)
3
Jeffrey, I don't really think the question was all that rude. My vote for Johnson was realistically based on the assumption that the Democrat would be the greater of two evils, and the Libertarian was not one I could support. I have met Rep. Johnson, and he is a genuinely pleasant and humble person, who also happens to have endured and survived torture at the hands of communists. Pretty much a hero by any definition in my book. That helps offset the disappointing 47% score he got from the Club for Growth on the up-or-down votes on 19 pork projects.
I would love for more Republicans to oppose the war on drugs, especially at the federal level. Unfortunately, the Democrats with whom I side on general matters of social issues (gay marriage, abortion) also want to use the clumsy machinery of state to force citizens to pay for them. I support stem cell research of all kinds and oppose the "pro-life" opposition to embryonic stem cell research and human cloning, but that doesn't mean I think the taxpayer needs to foot the bill for the research.
And sometimes the Libertarians field absolute loons that I just cannot support. The Democrats remain too much in favor of activist government on all fronts to earn my vote. Politics is messy, and I rarely feel very good about the choices I can make.
I keep hoping for a neo-Whig or neo-classical-liberal party to form.
Posted by: JohnL at November 16, 2006 10:50 PM (F7yTR)
4
Certainly it's fair enough treating Representative Johnson as the lesser or multiple evils. But you did initially say that he was "one of the few candidates that I feel really good voting for."
Personal character, and being a hero, certainly counts for something. But be careful of double standards, many people who support such heroes are also happy to vote for draft evaders.
As you note his dealings with pork and all of the social issues, puts him extremely far from the libertarian position.
Of course one can argue that stem cell research along with other subsidies should be eliminated, but that is not his position at all (he wants to increase subsidies to the oil and gas industries). Instead it is an example of the worst kind of abuses of government interference.
As you know, I'm not a libertarian, but consider myself a neo-liberal. But I think we all would like to see the public and politicians better understand the benefits and power of free choice and markets. Since seeing the news yesterday, I've been searching the house for my copy of "Free to Choose". I wish more people would read it.
Cheers,
-j
Posted by: Jeffrey Goldberg at November 17, 2006 10:33 AM (xzg5w)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 03, 2006
NaNoWriMo 2006
Well, I've foolishly decided to tilt at the
literary windmill again this year. I hardly lasted 3 days last year. And so far I only have a few hundred words this year.
No problem. This time around, I have taken the wise step of associating with some other like-minded writers to create an anthology of "Giant Evil Space Robot" fiction. By aggregating our work, we can reach the 50,000-word goal, without (we hope) creating too much unreadable dreck.
I'm spending a bit more time on plotting this time around, with the hope of producing something better. Check back every few days. Blogging will be light, but a bit more steady than it has been. Especially if I get in procrastination mode and avoid writing fiction by noodling around here.
Posted by: JohnL at
01:08 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 133 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Take heart: After several tries over the years, I hit a critical mass point this fall and wrote a 40,000 word book over only two months. Once you finally do get your brain warapped around the project, it will take on a life of its own. Mine's with an editor right now and ought to be printed in December after one more round of revisions.
Take a looooooong view.
Posted by: Hucbald at November 04, 2006 06:02 AM (nghZK)
2
Well, I am trying to get my own literary career off the ground by networking. I am now posting from the World Fantasy Convention in beautiful Austin. Got to meet Joe Halderman, L.E.Modesitt, Lynn Flewellen, Eric Flynt, Micheal Moorcock, David Drake, Glenn Cook, David Duncan, and Carol Berg(nicest person in the world).
I am meeting editors and learning what I have to do to get published.
Posted by: kyle8 at November 04, 2006 10:26 AM (CGown)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 01, 2006
Heinlein Quote of the Month (November 2006)
"Everything in excess! To enjoy the flavor of life, take big bites. Moderation is for monks."
- Lazarus Long in Time Enough For Love.
Posted by: JohnL at
07:38 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 38 words, total size 1 kb.
28kb generated in CPU 0.0968, elapsed 0.1434 seconds.
60 queries taking 0.1287 seconds, 178 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.