September 15, 2004
New Amazon Internet Search
I saw this new
Amazon internet search engine at
SFSignal today and naturally had to search "TexasBestGrok."
I was highly gratified to see my blog come up first. And, like the guys at SFSignal, I found the linked images feature pretty cool, too.
Along with the traditional search results on the left, a sidebar on the right was populated with images ranging from the Texas Republic circa 1845, to SpaceShipOne, to the appealing ladies of Buck Rogers in the 25th century.
Posted by: JohnL at
06:27 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 89 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Ok, now you've done it. If I might refer to this post [http://owlishmutterings.blogspot.com/2004/09/blogshares.html#comments].
You clearly get cooler hits on a search for your blog's name.
Posted by: owlish at September 15, 2004 07:10 PM (Nt0co)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 14, 2004
X-37 = SpaceShipTwo?
MSNBC and the
Desert News report that Burt Rutan's
Scaled Composites will be responsible for carrying the
X-37 technology demonstrator to altitude for test drops.
Contrary to the first report in the Desert News, Scaled has not yet confirmed whether the White Knight will be the ship that carries the X-37, as it does SpaceShipOne.
I find this very interesting, given Rutan's recent statements about developing an orbital analogue of SpaceShipOne as the next step in his business plan. I also find it interesting that the program has been transferred from NASA to an "unnamed government agency."
This is one to watch, folks.
Update: According to Keith Cowing's source, the "unnamed agency" is DARPA.
Update: And here's more from Space.com on the X-37 program and its transfer to DARPA.
Posted by: JohnL at
10:21 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 135 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Scaled Composites built the X-37 vehicle for NASA, btw, on a contract that is at least as old as the Tier One program, so it isn't SpaceShipTwo. SS2 is supposed to be a bit over twice the size of SS1, and will require a whole new mothership, twice the size of White Knight, be built to carry it. X-37 is meant to test a design for an unmanned satellite launcher and associated technologies, which is significantly different from a 9 passenger suborbital tourist vehicle.
Posted by: Mike Lorrey at August 17, 2005 01:01 PM (H7nt+)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 13, 2004
Rathergate Wrapup
I've been tracking this story since last Thursday morning, but haven't felt compelled to write anything about it, given the excellent efforts of Little Green Footballs (start
here and scroll to the present), PowerLine (start
here and scroll), Ace (again,
here and scroll), and the Creator of Worlds (
here), among many others.
This animated GIF, created by Charles Johnson (of LGF) is an overlay of the alleged 1973 memo to file with the same memo typed in Word 97 with default margins and 12 point Times New Roman Font. This really is all I needed to see to settle my opinion, and I would argue it is all any open-minded person would need to see:

Contrast that with Charles' efforts to overlay a reproduction of a real typewritten memo from the era:

Here's the original memo without overlay:

And here's another overlay, debunking the notion put forward by Edward Mendelson at PC Magazine that an expensive IBM typesetting maching (the Selectric Composer) would have produced an identical document:

Other good links here and here.
Update: Ouch. That's gotta hurt. Certainly nobody can accuse the Washington Post of partisan bias in favor of the President. (Link via Instapundit).
Posted by: JohnL at
10:46 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 201 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Yup. I told my parents Sunday to sell any big media stock they might have, not because MSM is evil, but because they are going down.
We'll see what the stock prices actually do.
Posted by: owlish at September 14, 2004 03:50 PM (Nt0co)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 09, 2004
Don Leslie, RIP

Donald J. Leslie, the man who invented the organ amplifier that bears his name, passed away last week at the age of 93.
If you like classic rock, gospel, or jazz, some of your favorite songs were most likely enhanced by a Leslie amplifier, which gave the Hammond organ its most recognized voice.
Leslie's invention was ingenious.

His amps typically contain a crossover that splits the audio signal, directing bass frequencies to a 15" speaker aimed down and the treble frequencies to a small driver facing up. Positioned below the bass speaker is a rotating drum (originally made out of plywood) and above the treble driver is a counterweighted horn. The drum and horn deflect the audio signal out through the louvres in the cabinet.

When set at slow speed (Chorale), the lower drum would rotate slowly and the horn not at all. But when switched to high speed (Tremolo), the top horn would rotate at up to 400 RPM. This produced the distinctive doppler-shifting vibrato that many associate with the classic Hammond sound.
I didn't know that Don Leslie was still alive as of last week, as he was not a major public figure. But as the proud owner of a Leslie 147 amp, I am thankful for his invention. You can read some of his obituaries here, here, and here. (Use Bugmenot for the registration-required sites).
Posted by: JohnL at
10:04 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 234 words, total size 2 kb.
1
That was a cool and interesting post. Thanks for taking the time to do this one!
Posted by: RP at September 10, 2004 12:24 PM (LlPKh)
Posted by: Deanna Leslie at April 06, 2005 02:01 AM (c18jW)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 08, 2004
September 05, 2004
Redesign 80% Complete
Sorry for the lack of content recently. I've been struggling with getting a stable 3-column css layout that doesn't look too busy.
The middle column still needs some work, I think, but I wanted to go ahead and throw this out there for feedback from my few regular readers.
Please email or comment with feedback on the new look.
Thanks!
Update: Make that 99.9% complete! Thanks for the feedback and compliments. Especially thanks to Madfish Willie for some solid, constructive criticism. I got rid of the dotted line under the banner, as well as the link-underlining in the sidebars. I also moved the sitemeter and scripts down to the bottom right, so that they would load last; I noticed they were keeping the right bar from loading quickly. Any other comments still welcome!
Posted by: JohnL at
12:52 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 139 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I like the galaxies. The middle column hides the right-hand column (Explorer, Mac OS 9). Also, the "preview" button in the comment box returns an error message (this is the second time I've tried to comment),
Posted by: Don at September 05, 2004 09:51 PM (IbJMu)
2
Don,
Thanks for the feedback, especially since you're a Mac user. I've gotten this to display properly (even in low resolutions like 800x600) in Firefox, Opera, and IE6 for Windows. Would you mind letting me know which version of Explorer you are using for the Mac? If you have Firefox, does this display better in that? If I know which version of Explorer you are using, I may be able to research what the compatibility issue is and work on a patch.
I don't have a clue what could be causing the preview button not to work, as it works on my setup (both IE6 for Windows and Firefox .8 for Windows). Thanks!
Posted by: John Lanius at September 05, 2004 10:40 PM (gplif)
3
John,
Looks cool. I've been wanting to add some spacey graphics to my blog, but I think I'll just link to yours!
Using IE 6.0: the columns are stable until I shrink the window width so that the middle column is about the width of the word "September" in the middle column, so, I just won't do that.
Posted by: chris at September 06, 2004 04:26 PM (zH1Gw)
4
I use IE 5. With Mozilla, it looks fine, and the preview works, too. I wouldn't sweat over making your site compatible with a lousy browser on an obsolete operating system. (I'm waiting for one last essential application to be ported to OS X, and then I'll be done with OS 9 forever.)
Posted by: Don at September 06, 2004 08:09 PM (+vEfr)
5
Mozilla 1.6 / Win XP Home / 1280x1024 resolution... everything looks fine, degrades fine when resizing the browser window, preview works fine in the comment window... on a personal preference level - the dotted line under the banner is a bit distracting, and the underlined links clutter up the side columns - again, that was just personal preference... I know, everyone is a critic...
Posted by: Madfish Willie at September 07, 2004 12:21 AM (ZQAP0)
6
Madfish,
Good comments. I'll probably adopt them. The dotted line originally went there to make sure the content and link divs were equidistant from the top. It was just a design tool that has outlived its usefulness.
The links on the side do look a little cluttered, too. Great, constructive criticism. My favorite kind!
Thanks again.
Posted by: John Lanius at September 07, 2004 08:05 AM (Hs4rn)
7
Looks good, John. From my perspective, the most important thing is that it is not over-styled so it is still easy to read the text postings.
Posted by: RP at September 08, 2004 08:47 AM (LlPKh)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 02, 2004
I'm a Liberal Democrat. . .
. . .
In Australia, that is, according to
this quiz.
Of course, their "liberal Democrats" are quite a bit different from ours. . .
HT: Yobbo.
Update: Prompted by Yobbo's comment, my scores were 17 for Economic Freedom and 15 for Social Freedom.
Posted by: JohnL at
12:14 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 56 words, total size 1 kb.
1
What were your scores John?
Posted by: Yobbo at September 02, 2004 01:04 AM (2X87q)
2
Yobbo,
My scores were:
Economic Freedom - 17
Social Freedom - 15
I liked your quiz, and you have a great site.
Posted by: John Lanius at September 02, 2004 09:53 AM (Hs4rn)
3
Thanks mate. My score was 16,16. More results from my other readers
here.
Posted by: yobbo at September 03, 2004 03:49 AM (3Gj4g)
4
My scores were Economic-12, Social-10. That puts me approximately mid-way between the two major parties, the Liberals (actually conservatives), and the ALP (Australian Labor Party), basically equivalent of Union-wing of the US democrats.
I consider myself a liberal (small l) though of the 19th century kind, not the idiotarian US kind. Different species entirely.
But hey, I'm Australian. The test is actually a reasonable approximation of the voting public's attitudes here. Rather to the right of Euro-Socialism, a tadge to the right of Canada, and definitely left of the US. If I was in the US, I'd vote Democrat (though not for Kerry!!!!).
Posted by: Alan E Brain at September 08, 2004 10:07 AM (assVM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
35kb generated in CPU 0.1153, elapsed 0.1837 seconds.
62 queries taking 0.1654 seconds, 191 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.